Introduction: Open Educational Resources in Higher Education

Open Educational Resources (OER) represent a transformative approach to educational content that prioritizes accessibility, affordability, and adaptability. These freely available, openly licensed materials include textbooks, course modules, videos, assessments, and entire courses that educators can use, modify, and share without restrictions on copyright. As textbook costs continue to burden students, OER provides a viable alternative that maintains academic quality while eliminating financial barriers to learning.

This blog post highlights five high-quality OER platforms that URI faculty can integrate into their courses. These resources require no special software, are completely free to access and use, and offer content across virtually every academic discipline.

TOP 5 OER PLATFORMS

1. LibreTextsWebsite: https://libretexts.org/

LibreTexts is one of the world’s largest OER platforms, providing free, openly licensed textbooks across multiple disciplines, including Biology, Chemistry, Physics, Mathematics, Humanities, and Social Sciences. All materials are peer-reviewed, regularly updated, and designed to replace expensive commercial textbooks while maintaining academic rigor. Faculty can adopt existing textbooks, remix content from multiple sources to create custom materials, or build entirely new resources using the platform’s authoring tools. LibreTexts integrates with learning management systems and includes built-in assessment tools and analytics, making it an excellent resource for reducing textbook costs while delivering high-quality, customizable educational content.

2. OpenStaxWebsite: https://openstax.org/

OpenStax is  a nonprofit initiative based at Rice University that provides free, peer-reviewed textbooks for high-enrollment college courses. The platform offers over 50 textbooks covering introductory courses in Biology, Chemistry, Physics, Math, Economics, History, Psychology, and Sociology. Each textbook undergoes rigorous peer review by faculty experts and is available in web view, PDF download, and low-cost print editions. OpenStax also provides supplementary resources such as instructor presentations and LMS integration packages. With over 6 million students using OpenStax materials and documented savings exceeding $1.5 billion in textbook costs, this platform offers a proven solution for zero-cost course materials.

3. OER CommonsWebsite: https://www.oercommons.org/

OER Commons is a comprehensive digital library providing access to over 500,000 open educational resources from around the world. OER Commons aggregates diverse content types, including full courses, modules, lesson plans, videos, simulations, and assessments across all disciplines. The platform offers advanced search capabilities, user reviews, ratings, and usage statistics. Faculty can create personal collections, align resources to learning standards, and remix existing materials using built-in authoring tools. The platform’s social networking features enable educators to connect, collaborate, and share best practices, making it both a resource repository and a professional community for OER implementation.

4. MIT OpenCourseWareWebsite: https://ocw.mit.edu/

MIT OpenCourseWare provides free access to course materials from over 2,500 MIT courses spanning undergraduate and graduate levels. The platform publishes actual course content, including syllabi, lecture notes, assignments, exams, videos, and interactive simulations from MIT’s Engineering, Science, Mathematics, Business, and Humanities departments. While not designed as a degree substitute, OCW provides valuable supplementary materials and teaching resources that faculty can adapt for their own courses. Video lectures are particularly valuable for flipped classroom models, and problem sets and exams make excellent practice materials. All materials are openly licensed for adaptation and redistribution.

5. Open Textbook LibraryWebsite: https://open.umn.edu/opentextbooks/

The Open Textbook Library, managed by the University of Minnesota, provides a curated collection of over 900 openly-licensed textbooks organized by academic discipline. Each textbook includes detailed faculty reviews evaluating accuracy, relevance, clarity, and pedagogical effectiveness, helping instructors make informed adoption decisions. The library covers Arts, Business, Education, Humanities, Mathematics, Medicine, Science, and Social Sciences. All textbooks are available for free PDF download, with many offering editable formats for customization and low-cost print options. The platform includes Pressbooks, an authoring tool that enables faculty to create, edit, or remix their own open textbooks, making it a comprehensive solution for both OER adoption and content development.

D2L is implementing a New Content Experience in Brightspace here at URI. It is a change in your content screen, where the content already developed takes a more intuitive and efficient process for delivering materials and improves the student digital learning experience. Creating new courses and content will be easier and involve less screens and passthroughs. This will affect both Brightspace and Engage.
When: The New Content Experience will be enabled in all courses starting May 2026.
Transition Period: This began in late August 2025. You can easily switch between Classic and New Content Experience as you explore the interface at your own pace. We encourage you to try NCE in advance, so it feels familiar by the time it becomes the default. At present, faculty may ‘opt in’ to try it out for you and your students.

Helpful Videos

No action is required on your part—your existing content will remain in place, and you’ll see the updated interface the next time you access the Content tool. This upgrade will make it easier for you to build and organize content while helping your learners to stay engaged and on track with their learning.

Highlights include:

icon for new content design concept

Modern and Streamline Design

  • Clean, visual layout with color-coded modules for better organization
  • Simplified workflows that reduce time spent on course management
  • Intuitive navigation that helps learners find what they need quickly

Brightspace IntegrationSeamless Integration with Brightspace Tools

  • Direct access to Assignments, Quizzes, Discussion, and LTI links within the Content tool
  • Fewew clicks and no more switching between tabs
  • Frequent course activities you need in one centralized location

Device icon

Mobile-Friendly and Accessible

  • Purposely designed to support accessibility needs
  • Responsive design that works smoothly on mobile, tablet, or desktop

We’re excited for you to experience this improved interface and are here to help every step of the way.
TLS Team

A Days Journey through the AI @ URI 2.0 Summit

Come with me on a journey exploring AI in teaching learning @ URI. It began as the URI Academic Summit welcomed faculty back to campus in January to discuss AI @ URI 2.0. Opening the event, a URI panel of staff, administration and faculty discussed where URI has come since the last Academic Summit in 2024 on AI and the future based on recommendations from the AI task force report. It is important to clarify that AI includes machine learning, neural networks, and robotics (around for decades), most of the topics for today’s summit address the narrower field of AI: generative AI which became rapidly widespread through open source products (such as ChatGPT). 

Innovative AI Integration in Teaching and Learning Breakout Session

This session explored the innovative ways faculty are incorporating AI into their classrooms. We heard from URI faculty, who are listed below, who have used AI for activities such as group work, individual projects, and programming assignments. Discussion included understanding the impact of AI on student learning and engagement and best practices for motivating students to use these tools effectively.

AI in Business Assignment for Game Creation

Christy Ashley, Marketing/Business
Christy Ashley discussed how students in her business courses made choices about AI tools for game creation. A guest speaker from Hasbro shared insights into how games are developed, and then she showed an example of the differences in game development using AI. Students often approached AI by simplistically replicating her work, not developing their own game creation.

Additionally, there were realtime considerations that impacted the use of the AI such as loading issues. Ashley highlighted the value of experimenting with new approaches in the classroom, experiencing mistakes, and thoughtfully reflecting on how to improve them for future use.

AI in Classroom Discussions and Assignments

Steven Atlas, Marketing/Business
Steven Atlas explored AI’s integration into classroom discussions, embedding learning about AI through discussion forums. He expressed the importance of determining clear parameters for the students. He also introduced optional AI supplements to assignments, allowing students to experiment with AI-generated content and refine their understanding.

For final projects, Steven encouraged students to use AI to develop research questions and benchmark AI behavior against human decision-making. This approach, particularly in marketing research, allowed students to explore how AI processes information differently from humans.

AI in Biology Education

Nic Fisk, Cell & Molecular Biology
Computational biologist and education researcher Nic Fisk emphasized designing assignments suiting the desired learning outcome, which may include how AI is used in research. They contrasted Google and ChatGPT in long-term retention, generalizability, and transfer of skills developed using these tools. They also noted that students’ frustration when they encounter AI-generated errors provides opportunities for learning. For example, prompting a generative AI and identifying missing nuances or important details can help students focus on the interesting elements of their writing or research.

AI’s Analytical Power in Research: Will and Christy

Will and Christy
Will and Christy discussed examining AI’s capabilities in deep analytics, contrasting human limitations with AI’s ability to process vast amounts of data. They highlighted how AI can significantly enhance research methodologies, but also raised concerns about over-reliance on AI-generated insights.





AI in Philosophy and Writing

Will Krieger
Will Krieger explored AI’s role in philosophical writing, emphasizing structured approaches to AI-assisted writing. Writing has always been the way we thought we need to assess philosophy. He has been exploring the outcomes of assignments and courses to consider integrating AI into the process. He implemented a three-submission assignment:

1 – A written detailed prompt asking for a detailed outline specifying sources, material, and objectives.
2 – Use AI to generate a structured essay based on the outline.
3 – Refine the AI-generated material into a final human-authored submission.

This three-submission assignment increases the instructor workload for assessing. Will found that this method worked well for half of the students, reinforcing the idea that specificity in AI prompting leads to better outputs.

AI’s Analytical Power in Research: Will and Christy

Vanessa Harwood
Vanessa Harwood, from the Communication Disorders field, discussed AI’s impact on speech-language pathology as it relates to the arduous chore of phonetic transcription. She noted that while AI can transcribe adult speech accurately, it often struggles with pediatric speech, and more so speech sound disorders.

However, AI tools can significantly reduce documentation time by encoding phonetic transcriptions that are arduous. She advocated for a three-step AI-assisted process that improves efficiency without sacrificing accuracy, where there is a cross check of AI output, ultimately reducing the time spent on transcribing and increasing the time spent with patients. 



Session Wrap Up: AI as a Tool for Thoughtful Integration

The panel concluded with a call for thoughtful AI integration in education. Faculty recognized AI’s ability to create efficiencies, but have also emphasized that it should not replace critical thinking. By understanding AI’s strengths and limitations, faculty can design courses that leverage AI’s benefits while maintaining academic rigor.

Keynote: Courage, AI Systems, and Troubles We Cannot Avoid

Dr. Vance Ricks

Dr. Ricks delved into AI ethics, discussing values in AI design, issue-spotting, and professional responsibilities. He introduced concepts of moral and techno-moral courage, drawing on Shannon Valor’s philosophy of ethical AI use. Key themes included:

  • The importance of intelligent hope and intelligent fear in AI adoption.
  • Recognizing AI as a socio-technological system embedded in broader social contexts.
  • Ethical considerations surrounding AI-driven decisions, especially in teaching and evaluation.

Broader Implications for Teaching Practices


Faculty acknowledged that both students and professors could misuse AI, raising concerns about academic integrity. The conversation emphasized:

  • The historical parallels between AI and past technological fears in advancements like Y2K, calculators, and Wikipedia.
  • The need for well-structured assignments that encourage critical engagement with AI.
  • Institutional approaches to shaping AI adoption in education, balancing efficiency with depth of learning.
Image for 2025 AI at URI 2.0
Ultimately, AI’s role in education will continue to evolve, and educators should remain adaptive, ensuring that AI serves as an enhancer to rather than a replacement for meaningful learning.
– Dr. Amanda Jensen

In today’s classrooms, the availability of Artificial Intelligence (AI) is impacting learning—it is a time of raising questions as AI provides a variety of options and insights. AI tools can now assist students in writing, problem-solving, and research; offering new levels of convenience and access. But, while these tools can be helpful, they also bring challenges. As educators, it’s crucial to not just introduce AI, but to cultivate an environment of critical thinking that balances both caution and curiosity, all the while empowering students to ask: What might be missing? Can I trust this output? and What does it mean to use AI responsibly?

Critical thinking has long been a cornerstone of higher education and intellectual development. In an AI-enabled world, students need to learn to go beyond using these tools; they need to understand how to generate insights through verifying information, as well as understanding the possibilities and limits of technology.

A group of students viewing screen togetheter vith AI background theme

When students engage in critical thinking with AI, they’re better prepared to:

  • Think creatively and independently: Critical thinking encourages students to consider multiple perspectives and solutions, rather than simply relying on AI-generated answers. This independence nurtures innovation and personal insight.
  • Distinguish fact from fabrication: While AI can generate vast amounts of text, not everything it produces is accurate. Encouraging students to fact-check and cross-reference helps cultivate a healthy skepticism.
  • Challenge assumptions: AI often reflects only its training data. By guiding students to analyze the sources (including question potential biases) and recognize how assumptions shape information, it can help foster critical thinking.

Key areas to explore in AI’s limitations include:

  • Accuracy and Misinformation: AI produces results based on patterns in data rather than true understanding. Students may mistake plausible-sounding, yet incorrect information, for fact, undermining their knowledge and learning integrity.
  • Data-Driven Biases: AI systems inherit biases from the data used to train them, potentially perpetuating skewed perspectives. Encouraging students to question these biases nurtures an awareness of how assumptions shape content, fostering a more discerning, balanced view of information.
  • Risks to Independent Thought: Over-relying on AI can hinder a student’s own critical thinking skills. While AI might offer shortcuts, true learning often comes from grappling with complexity, not from accepting easy answers.

Ultimately, while AI may seem to provide quick solutions, it cannot replace critical thinking. Many AI-generated responses appear confident and well-formatted, however although outputs may: miss nuance, need detailed fact checking, or reflect underlying biases from source materials. Approaching AI materials with critical thinking can help students in recognizing these pitfalls and develop habits of inquiry that can prevent them from adopting AI’s suggestions without expert review.

As an institution of higher education, we have the ability to foster a mindset of inquiry. Consider the following strategies to help students and ourselves engage thoughtfully and critically with AI:

  1. Encourage Source Verification: Just as we ask students to cite sources in their own work, we can guide them to question AI sources and verify AI-generated content. This practice reinforces the importance of credible information and builds a habit of checking facts.
  2. Examine AI’s Limitations Together: Bring AI-generated outputs into class discussions; exploring where they succeed and where they fall short. This exercise helps students recognize that AI’s “knowledge” is limited, often lacking the context, depth, and human judgment necessary for complex analysis.
  3. Practice “Spot the Error” Activities: Regularly review AI outputs in class to identify inaccuracies, ethical concerns, or biases. This approach not only develops a critical eye, but reinforces the idea that AI should be questioned and evaluated, and not just passively accepted.
  4. Engage in Ethical Dialogues: The ethics of AI use extend beyond academic integrity, it also includes privacy issues and potential societal impacts. Encouraging students to reflect on these implications fosters a responsible mindset, helping them consider the broader impact of their technology use.
Critical Thinking and Ai image

 

While AI tools can provide new educational possibilities, there’s value in asking when to use AI. Asking the question of whether AI truly serves the learning objectives of the course and assignment. Some lessons may be better learned by working through challenges without automated assistance, promoting creativity, resilience, and deep, independent analysis. However, by selectively incorporating AI, educators can help students appreciate it as a tool that, while powerful, doesn’t replace the need for human insight and critical judgment.

Encouraging thoughtful reflection with a little skeptism toward AI helps students maintain their intellectual independence. Rather than seeing AI as a replacement for their own reasoning, they’ll learn to use it as a complement to their critical thinking. This balanced approach supports a learning environment where technology is seen as a helpful aid but not an unquestionable authority.

In an AI-enhanced world, it’s more important than ever to cultivate critical thinking and intellectual independence in students. Through a balanced approach—one that blends curiosity with caution —we can empower students to use AI responsibly and thoughtfully. Let’s encourage our students to ask questions, challenge outputs, and think critically so that, no matter where technology advances, they are equipped with critical thinking, curiosity, and insight.

 

On December 29th, IT Teaching and Learning Services made a change to the mapping of eCampus and Brightspace user roles that will allow URI to better protect our students and their data. 

No roles were removed in this effort, simply mapping changes between eCampus and Brightspace. Users who are added to eCampus with the role of “Teaching Assistant” will continue to be added to the appropriate Brightspace courses, only they will now be added with “TA” access.  Teaching assistants who require more specialized access can be promoted by the instructor to a “TA Plus”.

Please follow the Knowledge Base guides below for additional information.

As educational technology becomes more prevalent in the classroom, collaboration and communication between IT subject matter experts and Faculty is more important than it has ever been. To help facilitate these interactions, IT Teaching and Learning Services, in collaboration with the IT Governance Committee, founded the Educational Technology Advisory Council (ETAC) in October 2023.

ETAC is an interdisciplinary group of URI faculty and IT experts who meet monthly to provide guidance on matters related to Brightspace and other technologies. It seeks to build a bridge between technology users and technology experts so that the entire URI community is better served.  

Some ongoing areas of focus include the review of new Brightspace Integrations and requests for system changes.   For the latest information, please visit our website, https://its.uri.edu/tls/educational-technology-advisory-council-etac/.

Options to create interactive and engaging digital content at URI are expanding…Sign up for pilots starting soon.

Image of students with technology

‘Interactive’ and ‘engage’ are two hot topics in higher education, and rightly so. They address the neurodiverse needs and active learning our students need. But there seem to be so many choices.
Camtasia has been available at URI for a number of years. It offers a user friendly interface with the capability to manipulate and augment videos utilizing features such as area blurring, musical overlays and pop up messages in your videos.

A few more robust content creation programs the IT TLS department is recruiting faculty for participants include:

Lumi Education – Building digital interactive elearning resources and use a SCORM package in your brightspace course for automatic grading. Click and drag words into fill in the blank paragraphs, create picture sequencing, and use a SCORM package in your brightspace course for automatic grading.

Student interacting with virtual molecules

 

Softchalk – Build digital case studies, content and assessments with this powerful content creation tool. This tool allows for custom designs and building your content for creativity; the limits are mostly your imagination. Use a SCORM package in your brightspace course to enable the interactivity of the created content. We are recruiting and working on a training for opportunities later this semester.

 

TLS department is also recruiting faculty in the following Pilot Program: Digital posters or projects by students – work with our team and your students to explore creation of digital posters for interactive presentations through apps such as Canva or Prezi. ****Submit your interest for the pilots by submitting a ticket to ask for more information and a consultation about joining a pilot.

Man sitting on a chair, looking at a laptop, imagining things he can learn.

Seminars. Lectures. Community learning. The University of Rhode Island’s reach extends far beyond our home in the Ocean State. Share your expertise, your research, and your knowledge with the world through URI’s public facing Learning Management System, Engage.

Engage gives the URI community the ability to offer for-profit learning opportunities to learners outside the URI student body. It is used today by programs such as the URI Master Gardeners, Wastewater Treatment, and Food Recovery.

Interested in learning how you can expand your reach and Engage with Rhode Islanders and beyond? Learn more by contacting:

Kevin Gray: IT Project Lead, Teaching and Learning Services
Michelle Rogers: Director of Teaching and Learning Services

A ram standing on a beach at sunrise.

Faculty often teach multiple identical course sections, which can be merged into one Brightspace course shell for convenience. This merging process consolidates students from different sections into a single Brightspace course shell. Keep in mind that if your course content significantly varies, merging may not be suitable.

Course Merge

Merging two or more sections into a single Brightspace class centralizes your course management, increases content consistency, and eliminates the need to juggle multiple classes. The primary objective behind section merging in Brightspace is to reduce redundancy, saving valuable time and minimizing the potential for errors.

In most cases, instructors will be responsible for merging their own course sections. To initiate the merge, you must be the course instructor or the admin of record for all the courses you wish to combine. Please only build course content in the section you intend to keep, as any content in the other sections will be lost after the merge.

It’s important to note that even though sections are merged immediately in Brightspace, individual student enrollment data may take up to 24 hours to synchronize and show up in your merged Brightspace course. Once the merge is complete, faculty are able to access the combined classlist and can use filtering tools to easily restrict the classlist to one section or the other. Faculty can also assign Teaching Assistants to specific sections as necessary.

When conducting course merges, it’s essential to consider the constraints set by academic regulations and student privacy laws, allowing you to make informed choices regarding the optimal utilization of this functionality within your courses. It’s important to note that sections instructed by different faculty members cannot be combined. This limitation is in place to protect the rights and privacy of both students and faculty. Additionally, it is suggested that instructors avoid merging sections when external tools are in use, as this may lead to issues.

The process of merging course sections can be more complex than expected. In such scenarios, faculty can always seek assistance from the Teaching and Learning Services (TLS) team through a Support Desk ticket via IT Service Portal at https://rhody.service-now.com/sp.

Merges conducted by TLS may require up to two business days to finalize. While this process is underway, your course may not appear as active in the system for students.

 

Note:

  • In the event you require the addition of a second faculty member to your course, you have a few options. You may request your department chair to include them as a second faculty member or designate them as an ‘admin of record’ for the specific course section within e-Campus. Alternatively, you can manually include them in your course as a ‘collaborator’ with content editing privileges or assign them a ‘guest’ role, providing read-only access.
  • Course section merging should not be confused with copying course content. To copy content from one section to another, such as from a previous semester to an upcoming one, faculty can use the Import/Export/Copy tool in Brightspace. Refer to this tutorial for detailed instructions on copying course content. View the guide on copying content in Brightspace.

URI faculty have free access to the Adobe Firefly AI image generator bot. Here is how to sign up.

All faculty and staff at URI have a full Adobe suite account. After you log into your Adobe account you’ll be able to use Firefly for free.

Logging In

Option 1: The most direct way to connect is to use your URI SSO to login here: https://firefly.adobe.com/
———————————–

Option 2: You may also reach Firefly via your URI Adobe Creative Cloud homepage, as follows:

Step 1: Click here and sign into your work Adobe account using your URI SSO credentials: https://creativecloud.adobe.com

Step 2: Click on the ‘waffle’ grid in the upper right-hand of the screen and then click on ‘All Apps’

Step 3: On the left-side menu of the ‘All Apps’ page you’ll find Firefly in the menu:

Use Prompt to Enter Keywords

On the Firefly homepage you’ll see a variety of options for different creative tasks you can do.

Step 1: Click on the one that says ‘Text to Image’ (this is what Midjourney and Bing AI both do too).

Step 2: Then type in your prompt.

Adobe Firefly Text Prompt Ideas

Resources

  1. AI Image generation ideas:
  2. How to create AI Art with Firefly:
  3. How to use ChatGPT to write image prompts for Firefly:
  4. Prompt Generator – create the text here and input it at Firefly to get the image:
    1. https://flowgpt.com/p/adobe-firefly-prompt-generator
  5. Comparison of prompts given to Adobe Firefly and also Midjourney to compare the output of the two different AI Image Generators:
    1. https://medium.com/@jarimh1984/transforming-visual-imagination-adobe-firefly-vs-midjourney-v5-a-comprehensive-comparison-of-661babcc0739